诉讼保全的创新与守正  

Innovation and Commitment to the Fundamental Principle of Litigation Preservation

作　　者：郭小冬 GUO Xiaodong

机构地区：[1]天津大学法学院

出　　处：《中国政法大学学报》2025年第2期89-107,共19页Journal Of CUPL

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重大项目《民法典与民事诉讼法的协同实施研究》(项目编号:22ZD&206)的阶段性研究成果。

摘　　要：“以保促调”“以保促执”“以保代执”的做法异化了诉讼保全制度的目的和功能;诉讼保全责任险的出现使得保全成为一种普遍适用的措施;保全错误给被申请人造成损失的,被申请人可以另行提起侵权诉讼主张赔偿,但法院驳回诉讼请求的比例却居高不下,进一步纵容了保全申请的任意。诉讼保全不再是一种为了判决实现而设置的保障措施,而是成为了人人可以利用以满足私人目的的工具。为了防止法律工具主义给法治建设带来危害,为了避免诉讼保全成为影响营商环境的负面因素,我们应当坚守那些已经形成共识的基本规则和原理。The practices of “preservation to facilitate mediation” “preservation to facilitate enforcement” and “preservation instead of enforcement” have distorted the purpose and function of the litigation preservation system.The emergence of litigation liability insurance has made the preservation a common measure.The respondent who caused losses by preservation error can file an infringement lawsuit,but the high proportion of the rejection of the claim is further condoning the arbitrary application of the preservation.As a result,litigation preservation is no longer a guarantee procedure for the judgment,but has become a tool that everyone can use to meet personal purposes.In order to prevent legal instrumentalism from causing harm to the rule of law and prevent it from becoming a negative factor that affects the business environment,the basic rules and principles that have formed a consensus should be upheld.

关 键 词：诉讼保全 法律工具主义 保全必要性 风险责任 

分 类 号：D925.1[政治法律—诉讼法学]