轻罪治理视野下的刑事审判程序适应性分化  

Adaptive Differentiation of Criminal Trial Procedures in the Perspective of Misdemeanor Governance

作　　者：张志英[1] 郑澳轩 ZHANG Zhiying;ZHENG Aoxuan(School of Law,Zhengzhou University,Zhengzhou 450000,Henan,China)

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450000

出　　处：《韶关学院学报》2025年第3期32-39,共8页Journal of Shaoguan University

摘　　要：积极刑法观的实质确立使得犯罪圈扩大,刑法参与社会治理程度加深,轻罪案件数量大幅上升,我国刑事诉讼程序在应对该状况时存在程序孤立、衔接不当等问题。基于程序出罪的附条件不起诉制度尚未实现既定目标。审判程序则因其普通程序设计拘泥传统重罪规制模式,简易程序、速裁程序在适用条件存在重合以及速裁程序分层建构缺失,导致治理效果未达预期。审判程序作为核心程序,为积极适应社会发展变化,防止因前置程序失灵影响裁判公正和效率,应当作出相应调整。此次《中华人民共和国刑事诉讼法》第四次修改,应当紧抓速裁程序在认罪认罚从宽制度和轻罪治理中的重要价值,对速裁程序进行分层建构,积极适应未来犯罪发展趋势。The establishment of the proactive criminal law perspective expands the scope of criminal offenses and enhances the difficulty of participation of criminal law in social governance,the quantities of minor cases dramatically increased.China’s criminal litigation procedures face some issues like procedural isolation and improper coordination.The conditional non-prosecution system has not achieved its goals,while trial procedures,constrained by traditional models,overlapping conditions for simplified and expedited processes,and lacking tiered construction,have under-performed.As the core procedure,trial procedures should be adapted to the changes in social development to prevent the impact on the fairness and efficiency of judgments due to the malfunction of the pre-procedure.Accordingly,the fourth amendment to the Criminal Procedure Law should enhance the expedited procedure’s role in the system of leniency for guilty pleas and minor offense governance through tiered construction,so as to adapt to future crime development trends.

关 键 词：积极刑法观 刑事审判程序 分层建构 轻罪治理 

分 类 号：D925.2[政治法律—诉讼法学]