检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:马化龙[1] MA Hualong(School of Humanities,Arts,and Digital Media,Hangzhou Dianzi University,Hangzhou Zhejiang 310018,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州电子科技大学人文艺术与数字媒体学院,浙江杭州310018
出 处:《杭州电子科技大学学报(社会科学版)》2025年第2期68-78,共11页Journal of Hangzhou Dianzi University:Social Sciences
基 金:国家社会科学基金项目(23BSH033)。
摘 要:数字化技术的飞速发展给当前高校反诈教育工作带来新的情势。作为公共行政和公共治理的新范式,协同治理正成为一种参考框架在高校教育现代化中逐步得到实践。当前高校反诈教育工作存有治理主体缺位,客观联动机制与主观场域认知不足,宣教实效性受限的现实问题。高校反诈教育实践处于治理资源、反诈信息、共治能量流转于多主体间的稳定开放系统,具有实质影响反诈主体协同治理意愿的“四维”主观驱动力结构,是以提高学生“三感”、建设平安高校、实现社会善治为终极治理旨归。将协同治理理论引入指导高校反诈教育实践,形成多主体联动的反诈立体治理网络,探索反诈工作协同推进的有效接合区间,实现传统资源、效果反馈、经验成果多态整合,构建统一的高校反诈教育共同体意识。最终建成以“主体协同”为基础、“机制协同”为行动、“资源协同”为保障、“意识协同”为趋向的全方位、多层次的反诈教育治理网络。The rapid advancement of digital technology has introduced new challenges to anti-fraud education in universities.As a new paradigm of public administration and governance,collaborative governance is increasingly being applied as a reference framework in the modernization of university education.However,current anti-fraud education in universities faces several issues,including the absence of governance entities,insufficient objective linkage mechanisms and subjective domain awareness,and limited effectiveness of educational campaigns.University-based anti-fraud education operates within a stable and open system where governance resources,anti-fraud information,and co-governance dynamics circulate among multiple actors.The willingness of these actors to engage in collaborative governance is shaped by a four-dimensional structure of subjective driving forces,ultimately aiming to enhance students'“three senses”(security,participation,and gain),build safe campuses,and contribute to broader societal governance.By incorporating collaborative governance theory into anti-fraud education,universities can establish a multi-actor interactive governance network,explore effective points of integration for coordinated anti-fraud initiatives,and achieve a dynamic integration of traditional resources,outcome feedback,and accumulated experiences.This approach fosters a unified awareness of the anti-fraud education community in universities.Ultimately,a comprehensive and multi-layered governance network for anti-fraud education should be constructed,founded on“actor collaboration,”driven by“mechanism collaboration,”secured through“resource collaboration,”and oriented toward“awareness collaboration.”
关 键 词:高校 协同治理 反诈教育 大学生 反诈教育协同治理体系
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145