检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者: 赵天舒(译) Jacob Rogozinski
机构地区:[1]不详 [2]北京大学中文系
出 处:《哲学分析》2025年第2期59-68,197,共11页Philosophical Analysis
摘 要:德里达视真理为解构的主要目标,并以此为中心来解构整个西方形而上学历史。然而矛盾的是,在坚持真理并不存在的同时,他却也断言真理必须存在。这一“必须”的律令似乎意味着解构离不开真理,解构就是实现真理。具体而论,通过分析真理的古希腊的原初形态aletheia,德里达认为非真理可以超越真理,因而他十分重视摹仿这一非真理模式,认为在摹仿中拟像的无限增殖会解构真理。但柏拉图却早已对摹仿的危险做出了警示,因此预示了解构对真理的根本依赖,证明了解构便是一场真理的操练。Derrida regards truth as the major target of deconstruction and makes it the central focus for deconstructing the entire history of Western metaphysics.Paradoxically,while maintaining that truth does not exist,he also asserts that there must be truth.This imperative of“must”seems to imply that deconstruction is in fact the implementation of truth.By analyzing the Greek concept of truth aletheia,Derrida argues that non-truth could surpass truth,which lets him to privilege mimesis as a mode of non-truth.He believes that the infinite proliferation of simulacra in mimesis would deconstruct truth.Yet Plato has long reminded us of the dangers of mimesis,thereby foreshadowing deconstruction’s dependence on truth.This demonstrates that deconstruction is,ultimately,an exercise of truth.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49