检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨简茹
机构地区:[1]广州美术学院跨媒体艺术学院
出 处:《创意与设计》2025年第2期12-16,共5页Creation and Design
基 金:广东省研究生教育创新计划项目(2024JGXM_111)。
摘 要:以生成式人工智能技术革命为背景,探讨数字化设计批评的学科边界与价值重构:一,人工智能既是工具亦是参与批评的“虚拟主体”,其算法逻辑与人类诗性思维的融合重塑了批评范式;二,人工智能虽能模拟印象主义批评的抒情特质,却难以企及人类批评家的情感深度与文化积淀,存在同质化风险。进一步指出,数字化批评的未来在于跨学科融合,通过新文科建设实现科技与人文的深度对话。尽管技术媒介深刻改变了批评的形态,但设计批评的核心仍在于维护人本价值,需警惕算法逻辑对审美判断的异化,最终实现人文理性与科技理性的辩证统一。This article explores the disciplinary boundaries and value reconstruction of digital design criticism against the backdrop of the generative artificial intelligence technology revolution.This article discusses two issues:firstly,artificial intelligence is both a tool and a"virtual subject"involved in criticism,and the integration of its algorithmic logic with human poetic thinking reshapes the paradigm of criticism;secondly,although artificial intelligence can simulate the lyrical characteristics of impressionist criticism,it is difficult to match the emotional depth and cultural accumulation of human critics,and there is a risk of homogenization.This article further points out that the future of digital criticism lies in interdisciplinary integration,achieving a deep dialogue between technology and humanities through the construction of new liberal arts.Although technological media has profoundly changed the form of criticism,the core of design criticism still lies in maintaining humanistic values.We need to be wary of the alienation of aesthetic judgments by algorithmic logic,and ultimately achieve the dialectical unity of humanistic rationality and technological rationality.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.49