推进高水平教育开放:变局中的挑战与路径(笔谈)  

Promoting High-Level Educational Opening-Up:Challenges and Pathways in a Changing Landscape(Symposium)

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:黄福涛[1] 郑高明 徐墨 武岳 肖茜 张优良 HUANG Futao;ZHENG Gaoming;XU Mo;WU Yue;XIAO Qian;ZHANG Youliang(Research Institute for Higher Education,Hiroshima University,Higashi-Hiroshima 739-8512,Japan;Institute of Higher Education,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;Research Center for Sino-European Cooperation in Higher Education,Tongji University,Shanghai 200092,China;Graduate School of Education,Beijing Foreign Language University,Beijing 100089,China;Deputy Secretary-General in China for the China-Africa Consortium of Universities Exchange Mechanism,Beijing 100089,China;Center for Internationl Security and Strategy,Tsinghua Univertity,Beijing 100084,China;Office of International Affairs,Tsinghua Univertity,Beijing 100084,China;College of Teacher Education,South China Normal University,Guangzhou 510631,China)

机构地区:[1]日本广岛大学高等教育研究开发中心,东广岛739-8512 [2]同济大学高等教育研究所,上海200092 [3]同济大学中欧高等教育合作研究中心,上海200092 [4]北京外国语大学国际教育学院,北京100089 [5]中非大学联盟交流机制中方秘书处,上海200092 [6]清华大学战略与安全研究中心,北京100089 [7]清华大学国际合作与交流处,北京100084 [8]华南师范大学教师教育学部,广州510631

出  处:《世界教育信息》2025年第4期3-18,共16页Journal of World Education

基  金:日本学术振兴会国際共同研究加速基金海外連携研究“地政学的な变化に対応した高等教育国際化に関する比较研究”,编号为24KK0049;全国教育科学规划青年课题“大国博弈背景下欧洲高等教育战略趋势及中国对策研究”,编号为CGA230337;中国高等教育学会2025年度委托课题“中非高等教育合作机制研究——以中非大学联盟交流机制为例”,编号为2025ZDWT01;全国教育科学规划课题“对世界讲好中国教育故事的案例研究”,编号为20235020004。

摘  要:进入21世纪以来,地缘政治环境发生巨大变化,高等教育国际化受到国际交往泛安全化的冲击,服务各国国际竞争和全球治理的特征愈加凸显。一些国家和国际组织通过调整签证政策、对大学及研究机构的合规要求、对科研合作项目的审查审批,实施并加强高等教育合作交流的“安全化”政策。同时,出于对资源禀赋、地缘政治价值等因素的考量,非洲、东盟和中亚等成为各国开展教育和青年项目的重点地区,以实现提升国际竞争和满足国内发展需求的目标。西方国家主导的高等教育国际化受到学界质疑和批判,新的理念在实践支撑下提出。“面向社会的高等教育国际化”强调通过国际或跨文化的教育、研究、服务和参与,惠及国内外更广泛的社区,将大学社会服务的第三职能与国际化相结合,超越了教学、科研和人员流动的传统范畴。面向未来,高校可发挥在知识生产和传播、平台建设、学术合作等方面优势,在数字教育、开放科学、区域性合作、全球性挑战领域的科研合作等方面寻求更大的合作空间。Since the beginning of the 21st century,the geopolitical environment has undergone tremendous changes.The internationalization of higher education has been significantly affected by the pan-security of international exchanges,and its role in serving national competitiveness and global governance has become increasingly prominent.Some countries and international organizations have implemented and strengthened“securitization”policies in higher education cooperation and exchange by adjusting visa regimes,tightening compliance requirements for universities and research institutions,and intensifying the scrutiny and approval of collaborative research projects.At the same time,driven by considerations such as resource endowment and geopolitical value,regions such as Africa,ASEAN and Central Asia have emerged as priority areas for the implementation of education and youth projects by various countries,aiming to improve international competitiveness and meet domestic development needs.The Western-led model of higher education internationalization has come under increasing academic scrutiny and criticism,prompting the emergence of new conceptual frameworks supported by evolving practices.Internationalization at Home and for Societies(IHES)emphasizes the benefit of serving broader communities both domestically and globally through international or cross-cultural education,research,service and participation.This approach integrates the university’s third mission of social service with internationalization,moving beyond the traditional focus on teaching,research and mobility.In the future,universities can leverage their advantages in knowledge production and dissemination,platform construction,and academic collaboration to explore greater opportunities in digital education,open science,regional partnerships,and collaborative research on global challenges.

关 键 词:高等教育国际化 地缘政治 国际合作 青年项目 大学智库 全球知识交流 

分 类 号:G649.511[文化科学—高等教育学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象