由《文选》具体录文观其以审美为依归——《文选》选文标准研究之二  

Viewing Its Aesthetics fromthe Specific Selections of Wenxuan——Research 2 on Selection Criteria in Wenxuan

作　　者：周春艳 ZHOU Chun-yan(College of Literature,Guizhou Minzu University,Guiyang 550025,China)

机构地区：[1]贵州民族大学文学院,贵州贵阳550025

出　　处：《遵义师范学院学报》2025年第2期62-65,共4页Journal of Zunyi Normal University

基　　金：贵州民族大学博士科研启动项目“文体嬗变视域下的《文选》‘文’编纂研究”(GZMUSK[2024]QD69);国家社会科学基金一般项目“《文选》五臣李善二家注论衡”(19BZW061)。

摘　　要：萧统于《文选序》仅指出该书“入耳之娱”“悦目之玩”之选文落脚点与不录“经、子、史”之范围,而未明言其标准。然由全书具体录文观之,“赋”“诗”“骚”三体总录文数及所占全书篇幅,多于其余36类实用性文体;朝代有“近详远略”之倾向;虽破例选录少数“赞论”“序述”类文章,却指明“综缉辞采”“错比文华”乃其入选之前提。可知《文选》选文实与《序》之主张保持一致,更重视文章之美感而非功用,即以审美为依归。When Xiao Tong wrote the preface for wenxuan, he only pointed out the aim of the selection was to“entertain the ears”and“entertain the eyes”, and the scope of selection was out of“Jing, Zi, Shi”, but did not specify its standard. However, from the detailedrecord of the book, the tree styles of“Fu”“Shi”“Sao”took over the total number and the book length, and were more than the other 36types of practical style. The dynasty tended to“detail the near and generalize the far”. Although it made an exception and selected a fewarticles related to“Zan Lun”and“Xu Shu”,it pointed that the premise of being selected was the flowery language. Therefore, we cansee that the concrete record of Wen Xuan was consistent with the preface, and the grace of the language was more important than thefunction of the article, in all, its selection was based on aesthetics.

关 键 词：《文选》 选文标准 具体录文 落脚点 审美 

分 类 号：I06[文学—文学理论]