“徙戎”何以非法--船山视角下夷夏大防的一个面向  

An Analysis of the Illegality of“Relocating the Barbarians”--An Aspect of the Grand Distinction Between China and Barbarians from the Perspective of Chuanshan

作　　者：王羿龙 Wang Yiong(School of Humanities,Tsinghua University,Beijing 100084,China)

机构地区：[1]清华大学人文学院,北京100084

出　　处：《衡阳师范学院学报》2025年第2期19-25,共7页Journal of Hengyang Normal University

基　　金：国家社会科学基金重点项目“王船山思想与中华优秀传统文化研究”(21AZD105);国家社会科学基金后期资助项目“王船山公正思想研究”(19FZXB070)。

摘　　要：明末清初,族群冲突逐渐加剧,如何在夷狄之世保存中国文明,乃至如何论证中国文明的主体性,成为当时士人关怀的核心问题。王船山的有关论述无疑是其中极精彩的部分。延续时人对曹魏以来“徙戎”政策的批评,船山一方面借助对“变夷”问题的讨论,聚焦中国夷狄化所具有的“中国”与“夷狄”的双重性质,警惕“变”的滑落;另一方面,船山借助重新申张中国文明的纯粹性,又见出中国与夷狄在“地维”的意义上何以是一种概念,而不只是一种政治实体。结合近当代的历史人类学的研究,尤其可见船山此种论述所存有的现实意义。In the late Ming and early Qing dynasties,ethnic conflicts gradually intensified.How to preserve Chinese civilization in the era of barbarians,and even how to demonstrate the subjectivity of Chinese civilization,became the core concern of scholars at that time.Wang Chuanshan’s relevant discourse is undoubtedly one of the most exciting parts among them.Continuing the criticism of the“migration of barbarians to the inland”policy since the Cao Wei period,Wang Fuzhi,on one hand,focused on the dual nature of“China”and“barbarians”in Chinese barbarization through discussions on the issue of“transforming into barbarians”,in order to be wary of the decline of“transformation”.On the other hand,by reasserting the purity of Chinese civilization,we can also see how China and the barbarians have become a concept in the sense of“earth dimension”,rather than just a political entity.Combining the research of historical anthropology in modern times,it is particularly evident that the discourse of Chuanshan holds practical significance.

关 键 词：王夫之 夷夏观 徙戎 

分 类 号：B249.2[哲学宗教—中国哲学]