检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:郑蓉[1] 濮敏雅 ZHENG Rong;PU Minya(School of Public Management,Hangzhou Normal University,Hangzhou 311121,China)
机构地区:[1]杭州师范大学公共管理学院,浙江杭州311121
出 处:《健康研究》2025年第2期205-209,共5页Health Research
基 金:国家社会科学基金青年项目(19CSH020);浙江省民政政策理论研究课题(ZMKT202495)。
摘 要:人工智能技术应用于婴幼儿照护为父母和照护人员提供了智能化的帮助和支持,但也由此带来了情感递偿与情感迁移的双重误区。文章通过解构情感递偿与情感迁移的主体异化过程,揭示算法权力对情感本真性的殖民化逻辑和伦理后果:数字情感递偿通过数据化暴力将生命体验降维为可计算参数,导致具身性认知断裂;情感迁移重构“界面化存在”的新型主体形态,消解他者伦理的在场性;提出通过“具身抵抗”的伦理实践策略,守护婴幼儿情感发展的生命性本质,是较为可行的婴幼儿情感照护修复路径。The application of artificial intelligence technology in infant and toddler care provides intelligent assistance and support for parents and caregivers,but it also leads to the dual misconceptions of emotional compensation and emotional transference.This paper deconstructs the process of subject alienation in emotional compensation and emotional transference,revealing the logic and ethical consequences of colonization by algorithmic power over the authenticity of emotions.Digital emotional compensation reduces life experiences to computable parameters through data-driven violence,causing a rupture in embodied cognition.Emotional transference reconstructs a new form of subject existence as“interfacial beings”dissipating the presence of ethics from others.The ethical practice strategy of“embodied resistance”serves as a feasible path for the restoration of emotional care for infants and toddlers by effectively safeguarding the living nature of their emotional development.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.38