罗蒂的形而上学哲学批判对中国美学的启示  

On the Enlightenment of Rorty’s Critique of Metaphysics for Chinese Aesthetics

作　　者：郝二涛 HAO Ertao(College of Literature and Journalism,Xiangtan University,Xiangtan 411105,China)

机构地区：[1]湘潭大学文学与新闻学院,湖南湘潭411105

出　　处：《燕山大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2025年第3期64-71,共8页Journal of Yanshan University:Philosophy and Social Science

基　　金：湖南省哲学社会科学基金课题“罗蒂的教化思想对中国式美育学建设的启示研究”(22YBQ050)。

摘　　要：西方传统形而上学哲学是现代西方哲学与中国现代美学的共同的话语资源与共同的阻碍。如何摆脱西方传统哲学话语的束缚,是现代西方哲学学者与中国现代美学学者都在努力解决的一个问题。解决该问题的关键是,找到西方传统形而上学哲学的优缺点,扬长避短。罗蒂发现,西方传统形而上学哲学的优点是,在同质化与二元论的假设中追求永恒的真理。其不足是,相对忽略了事物和现象的差异性、偶然性。罗蒂试图通过彻底承认偶然,摆脱西方传统形而上学哲学话语的束缚。这启示我们,中国现代美学话语建构应在美学学科之中,着重克服美学话语建构的二项对立、本质主义、感性主义策略之局限,彰显审美话语兼性、审美现象的偶然性、感性的度。Traditional Western metaphysics serves as both a shared discursive resource and a common obstacle for modern Western philosophy and modern Chinese aesthetics.How to break free from the constraints of traditional Western metaphysical discourse is a critical issue faced by both Western philosophers and Chinese aesthetic scholars.The key to addressing this challenge lies in identifying and leveraging the strengths of traditional Western metaphysics while avoiding its weaknesses.According to Rorty,the strength of traditional metaphysics lies in its pursuit of eternal truths grounded in assumptions of homogenization and dualism,while its primary weakness is an insufficient recognition of the diversity and contingency of phenomena.Rorty seeks to escape the limitations of traditional metaphysical discourse by embracing radical contingency.This perspective offers valuable insights for the construction of modern Chinese aesthetic discourse,encouraging scholars to overcome the limitations of binary oppositions,essentialism,and aestheticism within the field.Instead,focus should be placed on highlighting the interrelation within aesthetic discourse,the contingency of aesthetic phenomena,and the measure of sensibility within aesthetics.

关 键 词：二元对立 本质 偶然 形而上学 伦理美学 

分 类 号：B83[哲学宗教—美学]