高考英语议论文教、学、评一致性的路径与策略——以2024年高考英语(天津卷)D篇阅读理解为例  

Pathways and Strategies for the Consistency of Teaching,Learning,and Assessment in the Gaokao English Argumentative Essay:A Case Study of the 2024 Tianjin Gaokao English Reading Comprehension Section D

作　　者：邵琴[1] Shao Qin(Tianjin Experimental Binhai High School,Tianjin,300459)

机构地区：[1]天津市实验中学滨海学校,天津300459

出　　处：《考试研究》2025年第3期69-76,共8页Examinations Research

摘　　要：探讨高考英语议论文教学中实现教、学、评一致性的具体路径。对比2024年高考英语(天津卷)D篇阅读理解与外研社教材中的对应语篇,揭示两者在主题、文体、语言和文化等方面的相似性,并通过高考阅读微技能与思维品质的层次分析,探讨高考命题和教材阅读活动设计上的差异与互补性。总结教、学、评一致性路径下的相关教学策略,包括融入语篇分析策略、培养思维品质、强化文化意识渗透。建议基于高考命题的反拨作用设计教学活动,以提升学生的思维品质与语言运用能力,实现教、学、评一致性,促进学生学科核心素养的全面发展。This article explores the specific pathways to achieving consistency in teaching,learning,and assessment in the context of English argumentative essay instruction for the Gaokao.It focuses on a comparison between the 2024 Tianjin Gaokao Reading Comprehension Section D and the corresponding text in the Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press(FLTRP)textbook.The study reveals the similarities between the two in terms of themes,genres,language,and culture,and discusses the differences and complementarities in the design of Gaokao reading tasks and textbook reading activities through a layered analysis of micro-skills and cognitive qualities.Finally,the article summarizes the related teaching strategies within the framework of teaching,learning,and assessment consistency,proposing that by leveraging the backward design of Gaokao exam tasks,teachers can enhance students′cognitive qualities and language proficiency,thereby achieving consistency and promoting the overall development of students′core competencies.

关 键 词：教、学、评一致性 核心素养 议论文 语篇分析 

分 类 号：G424.74[文化科学—课程与教学论]