抗战时期国共两党持久抗日战略方针之比较  

Comparison of the protracted anti-Japanese policy and strategy between two parties during the period of Anti-Japanese War

作　　者：王云江[1] 杨英法[2] 

机构地区：[1]河北建筑科技学院,河北邯郸056038 [2]邯郸农业高等专科学校,河北邯郸057150

出　　处：《河北建筑科技学院学报（社会科学版）》2002年第4期55-57,共3页Journal of Hebei Institute of Architectural Science & Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：抗日战争时期 ,共产党的抗日战略方针是“持久战” ,国民党的抗日战略方针并非通常所认为的“速胜论” ,而是“持久战” ,或叫“持久消耗”。两种抗日战略方针虽有某些相同相似之处 ,但也有许多不同。两者相比 ,国民党的抗日战略方针在许多方面都显得逊色 。During the period of Anti-Japanese War, the strategy and policy of the Communist Party is "Protracted War",while the National Party preferred not "Theory of Speed Victory" as commonly assumed, but the "Lasting War" or "Continuous Consume". Although there are some similarities between the two strategies, Many differences still existed. Compared with each other, the strategies of the Nationd Party appear inferior to that of the Communist Party in my respects. That shows more important of Mao Zedong's theory of "Protracted war".

关 键 词：持久战 速胜论 持久消耗 抗日战争方针 

分 类 号：K265[历史地理—历史学]