论教育担当精神——孟荀教育思想比较的角度  

On Education Spirit——A Comparative Education Thought of the Spirit of Mengzi and Xunzi

作　　者：张乃芳[1] 周乔[2] 

机构地区：[1]华北电力大学哲学与文化研究所,河北保定071000 [2]华北电力大学政教部,河北保定071000

出　　处：《科教导刊》2017年第4Z期3-4,共2页The Guide Of Science & Education

基　　金：河北省社会科学基金项目HB15ZX006

摘　　要：孟子和荀子以孔子教育担当为精神主旨,均认为教师是教育担当的主体力量,强调尊敬师长。不同的是,孟子从"天之所予"的性善出发,侧重人的主体自觉和自我修养,而荀子则以"天人相分"的性恶为依据,重视教师监督和礼乐教化。在此基础上,二人都希望培养出具有君子和圣人品格的学生,并最终为政治统治服务。Meng Zi and Xunzi to take the education of the spirit of the spirit of the subject, teachers are considered to be the main force of education, emphasizing respect for teachers. Is different from Mencius 'days to' good start, focus on the human subject consciousness and self-cultivation, and Xunzi for 'Heaven phase' evil nature as the basis, pay attention to teachers' supervision and music education. On this basis, two people want to cultivate the character of a gentleman and Saint, and ultimately serve the political rule.

关 键 词：孟子 荀子 教育担当 

分 类 号：G40[文化科学—教育学原理]