检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:张光全[1]
出 处:《安徽大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》2003年第3期96-100,共5页Journal of Anhui University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
摘 要:司马迁、班固在著史“实录”精神上的异趣 ,究其根由 ,除了他们的个人经历、识见不尽相同外 ,关键还在于两人身处的社会环境不同。在司马迁所处的时代 ,文化专制刚刚开始 ,“为尊者讳”的社会风气还未形成 ,司马迁尚能比较自由地著书立说。班固之时 ,随着专制统治的加强 ,人们在评事论政时顾忌颇多 ,“讳君亲之恶”已成一种时习 ,而班固著书又受到最高当权者的直接干预 ,这使得他在许多问题上只能趋于正统。Ban Gu was inferior to Sima Qian in the spirit of veritable recording. The essential reason lies in the different social and historical environment in which they lived respectively. In Sima Qian's time, there was a weak trend in society to conceal and avoid the misdeeds and mistakes of the honorable. Therefore, he was free in writing books. While in Ban Gu's era, with the consolidation of autocratic system, people hesitated to commend on the current affairs. Ban Gu's work was heavily interfered by the authorities, which forced him to show conservatism and orthodox in many affairs.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117