论“语用学转向”及其意义  

The “Linguistic Turn" and Its Significance

作　　者：殷杰[1] 

机构地区：[1]山西大学科学技术哲学研究中心,太原030006

出　　处：《中国社会科学》2003年第3期53-64,共12页Social Sciences in China

摘　　要：本文立足于 2 0世纪科学哲学和语言哲学的历史发展 ,从哲学方法演变的视角上 ,阐述了“语用学转向”的内在动因 ;总结了语用思维在德国、英国、法国和美国哲学传统以及维特根斯坦和哈贝马斯哲学中的表现形式和基本观念 ,并从大陆哲学和英美哲学、科学主义和人文主义合流的角度揭示了语用思维的意义 ;分析了科学解释模型、指称理论、真理观念和意向性思维朝向语用化的发展 ,揭示了语用学转向给哲学研究带来的新的思维和观念 ,指出“语用学转向”为哲学提供了新的对话平台 ,形成了新的哲学发展生长点。Reviewing the development of the philosophy of science and of language in the 20 th century, the author explores the inner need for a “linguistic turn' in terms of changes in philosophical methodology, and inquires into the forms and concepts of pragmatic thought in German, British, French and American philosophical traditions, as well as in Wittgenstein and Habermas. Pragmatic thought has played a role in the confluence of continental philosophy and Anglo American philosophy, and of scientism and humanism. Efforts were made to analyze linguistic models of scientific explanation, reference theory, ideas about truth and intention, and to identify new philosophical thought and ideas stemming from the linguistic turn that has provided a new framework of dialogue and a new point of growth for philosophical development.

关 键 词：“语用学转向” 语言哲学 哲学方法 科学哲学 语用思维 逻辑 “语言游戏”语用学 普遍语用学 科学解释模型 指称理论 真理观 心理意向 

分 类 号：H03[语言文字—语言学]