检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]沈阳建筑大学外国语学院,辽宁沈阳110168
出 处:《沈阳建筑大学学报(社会科学版)》2015年第5期529-535,共7页Journal of Shenyang Jianzhu University:Social Science
基 金:辽宁省高校外语教学改革专项项目(WYYB014126);沈阳建筑大学青年基金项目(2014024)
摘 要:运用语料库Ant Conc3.2.1w检索软件对自建语料库JZ、美国母语语料库LOCNESS和非母语语料库CLEC进行检索,对比及分析因果连词在三个语料库中的使用特点,利用句法赋码及人工方法删除非因果关系的连词或介词。同时,运用社会统计软件SPSS11.5分析及对比数据。运用定量分析方法,对比分析了英语议论文写作中的因果连词。结果表明:非母语英语学习者与母语英语学习者在议论文写作中因果连词的使用频率、使用密度和多样性上均存在显著性差异,非母语英语学习者议论文中因果连词的使用密度高于母语者,而多样性却低于母语者。This paper applies corpus retrieval softw are Ant Conc3. 2. 1w to retrieve,compare and analyze casual conjunctions in self- established corpus JZ,native speakers' corpus LOCNESS and non- native speakers' corpus CLEC. Furthermore,the paper uses syntactic tagger as w ell as artificial method to delete those conjunctions or prepositions w hich do not express casual relationship. In addition,social statistics softw are SPSS11. 5 is also implemented to analyze and compare data.With quantitative analysis method,the paper contrasts and analyzes casual conjunctions in English argumentative papers. The result show s that using frequency,using density and diversity of casual conjunctions in English argumentative w ritings have significant difference betw een native speakers and non- native speakers. Using density of conjunctions w hich express casual relationship from non- native speakers' English argumentative w ritings is higher than those from native speakers w hile the diversity of casual conjunctions is low er than that in native speakers' English argumentative w ritings.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.117