蔓衍与分延:庄子与德里达的语言哲学  

Spreading and Difference—— Language philosophy of Zhuang Zi and Derrida

作　　者：陈喜辉[1] 田新华[1] 

机构地区：[1]哈尔滨工业大学人文与社会科学学院,黑龙江哈尔滨150001

出　　处：《华中科技大学学报（社会科学版）》2003年第6期61-65,共5页Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：道家哲学没有本体论,没有镜式主体,道生万物,道即万物,所以"道"与"逻各斯"的"在场的形而上学"大异其趣。庄子与德里达的相遇是在语言哲学上,他们都在思想与世界之间塞进了漂泊而暧昧的语言夹层。本文以庄子的"曼衍"与德里达的"分延"相发挥。德里达强调语言的隐喻特征,又恰好与庄子的"三言"巧合。语言既然不足以传达真理,二家就顺理成章地将哲学推向了文学。There are no ontology and mirrorstyle subjects in Taoist philosophy,which holds that Tao is the origin of everything. In this sense, Taoist philosophy is different from Logo's metaphysics at presence. It is at the point of language philosophy that Derrida and Zhuang Zi share a common view. Both believe that dueto its uncertainty and ambiguity, language cannot access humans to the truth of the objective world. This paper, starting from Zhuang Zi's concept of spreading and Derrida's differance, analyzed that Derrida put more emphasis on the language feature of metaphor, which coincided with Zhuang Zi's three styles. Since they believe that language cannot fulfill the task of conveying the truth about the world, both Zhuang Zi and Derrida have to turn to literature from philosophy for help.

关 键 词：道 逻各斯 语言 拟文学 

分 类 号：B223.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学] B565.59