检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:朱宝荣[1]
机构地区:[1]复旦大学哲学系,上海200433
出 处:《自然辩证法研究》2003年第12期72-76,共5页Studies in Dialectics of Nature
摘 要:尽管计算机模拟实现了人类认知功能的物化,也为揭示人类认知活动机理开辟了新的途径,但学术界对认知功能的计算机模拟仍存在不同评价。为此,本文从理论层面对认知模拟作了辩证分析,在肯定其具有三项意义的同时,也指出其无法克服的诸多局限。笔者认为,客观评价认知功能的计算机模拟,有助于认知科学家在理论研究中尽早揭示和了解人类认知的规律与机制,在应用研究中能牢牢把握智能模拟的正确方向。The simulation of computer materializes man's cognitive function and opens up one new way to reveal the mechanism of man's cognitive activities. But the Academic Circle differently evaluates the cognitive function of the simulation of computer till now. For this, this article dialectically analyzes the cognitive simulation from the theoretical point of view. It both affirms its three significances and points out its a good many limitations which cannot be overcome. It argues that objective evaluation of the cognitive function of simulation of computer can contribute to discover and know the laws and mechanism of man's cognitive activities as soon as possible in the theoretical research, and firmly hold the right direction in applied research on artificial intelligence for cognitive scientists.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:18.216.248.35