徒手肌力检查与定量肌力检查相关性初探  

A study of correlation of manual muscle strength test scores with electromvometer test scores

作　　者：窦祖林[1] 南登昆[2] 

机构地区：[1]安徽医科大学附属医院理疗科,230022 [2]同济医科大学附属同济医院康复科,230022

出　　处：《中国康复医学杂志》1992年第3期109-111,共3页Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine

摘　　要：用传统徒手肌力检查(MHF)和MVC-I型电子肌力仪定量检测技术对70例神经肌肉障碍者瘫侧膝伸肌、肘屈肌和髋屈肌的最大等长随意收缩肌力(MVC)进行测定。结果表明,两种方法所获3个肌群百分率显著相关(P<0.001),但差异显著(P<0.01)。这意味着两种测力方法可以互相取代,但在反映量的程度上有明显区別。作者认为在临床康复肌力评定中,对于3级以上的肌力辅以定量检测较理想。A study of correlation of manual muscle strength test scores with electromyometer test scores/Dou Zu-lin, et al//Chinese Journal of Rehabilitation Medicine, 1992,7(3): 109～111 The muscle strength in knee extension, elbow and hip flexors of 70 patients with neuromuscles disorders was investigated using traditional manual muscle testing (MMT)and handheld electromyometer. The result showed that MMT scores and dynamometer test scores precentage obtained from the three muscle groups were significantly correlated(P<0.001). The MMT and dynamometer test score were significantly different among the three muscle groups(P<0.01). This means that the two procedures measure the same variable-strength, but the degrees of strength differ significantly. This paper suggests that MMT is an effective testing method for muscle force under grade 3. Quantitative measurements of strength is more appropriate for muscle force above grade 3. Author's address: Department of Physical Therapy, Anhui Medical University Affiliated Hospital

关 键 词：肌力 定量评价 神经肌肉病 

分 类 号：R746.09[医药卫生—神经病学与精神病学]