中立与合意——两大法系鉴定证据制度的融合  

“Neutral with Pleasing”——Combination Between Two Law Systems on Authenticating the Proof System

作　　者：黄维智[1] 

机构地区：[1]四川大学,四川成都610031

出　　处：《现代法学》2004年第2期181-186,共6页Modern Law Science

摘　　要：鉴定证据制度是人类社会发展进步的必然产物 ,是证明方法理性和文明的标志。两大法系的鉴定证据制度围绕公正和效率的主题互相借鉴和学习过程中 ,表现出鉴定启动从“随意”到“令状”、主体选择的“合意”先于“指定”、主体地位从“依附”到“独立”、双方认同的“合意”优于“程序”的趋势。我国目前鉴定证据制度中存在鉴定启动的随意性、鉴定主体地位缺乏应有的中立、双方当事人的举证权利未受到平等对待等一系列问题 ,为实现司法公正与效率的价值目标 ,“中立与合意”Authenticating the proof system is an inevitable outcome that human society development progresses, is a proof method reasonableness with the civilized marking. The two greatest methods department authenticates the proof system around fair draw lessons from with study with the topic of the efficiency each other in the process, express a“pleasing” for authenticating to start to choose from “as one's pleases” to the “writ”, corpus to surpass the trend of the “ procedure” from “depend on” to the “pleasing” of the “independence”, corpus will in the “specify”, corpus position first. Our country authenticates to exist to authenticate to start in the proof system to offer as proof with the neutral, both parties' , the party concerned that corpus position lack and should have now the right is not waited by equal respect a series of problem, for realize the judicatory is fair and the worth a target of the efficiency, the “neutral with pleasing” is an our country to authenticate the proof system reforms inevitable choice within process.

关 键 词：鉴定证据制度 专家证言 举证权利 诉讼当事人 英美法系 诉讼制度 大陆法系 

分 类 号：D915.13[政治法律—诉讼法学] D915.1[政治法律—法学]