对我国传统犯罪客体理论的反思与重构  

Introspection and reconstruction on the traditional theory of criminal object

作　　者：邹仪科[1] 

机构地区：[1]中山大学法学院2003级,研究生广东广州510275

出　　处：《闽西职业大学学报》2004年第1期58-61,共4页Journal of Minxi Vocational College

摘　　要：将犯罪客体的内容界定为“社会关系”的传统理论存在众多不足,缺乏作为犯罪构成要件所应当具有的特质,因而不具备其应有的认定犯罪的功用。而犯罪对象是指危害行为指向的具体的人、物和无体物。犯罪对象能被人们的感观感知,是具体、实在的事实特征,能与犯罪构成的其他要素相对称、相协调,他们具有同质性,整合在一起能达到认定犯罪的目的。因而,要完善犯罪客体理论,使犯罪客体真正成为司法实践中定罪的规格、标准,必须还犯罪客体以本来面目,将现在对犯罪对象的界定作为犯罪客体的内涵。There are many defects in the traditional theory of criminal object, which is currently defined as “ social relation” . More and more scholars find out that “ social relation” lacks the essential content to be criminal object in criminal constitution system. Therefore, it is unable to distinguish crimes from other kinds of actions. This article points out that in order to perfect the theory of criminal object, we should redefine criminal object and turn it into a specific rule or some standard capable of making out crimes. Meanwhile, present criminal constitution theory refers criminal target to person, fortune and invisible fortune. Its content is specific, real and apt to be imagined by the people. Criminal target coincides with other- three elements of criminal constitution because of the same essential characters. Being combined with other- three elements, criminal target can make it sure what crime is. As a result, the article draws the conclusion that when defining criminal object, the content of criminal target ought to take the place of “ social relation” .

关 键 词：犯罪客体理论 刑法 演绎推理方法 语法错误 “犯罪对象说” 定位 

分 类 号：D924.11[政治法律—刑法学]