试论我国行政诉讼中举证责任的分担  

The Partaking of Evidential Burden in Chinese Administrative Procedure

作　　者：张志英[1] 云剑[2] 

机构地区：[1]郑州大学法学院,河南郑州450052 [2]郑州航空工业管理学院,河南郑州450015

出　　处：《郑州航空工业管理学院学报（社会科学版）》2004年第3期74-75,共2页Journal of Zhengzhou University of Aeronautics(Social Science Edition)

摘　　要：举证责任中最具实质意义的是后果责任。行政诉讼中后果责任的分配由原、被告分担。被告就行政行为的合法性及原告已超诉讼时效承担举证责任。但原告也要承担相应的举证责任,比如其首先要证明具体行政行为的存在,否则将承担不利的诉讼后果。The outcome burden of evidential burden is essential. The outcome burden is partaked by the plaintiff and the defendant in the administrative procedure.The defendant should prove that his frondose administrative behavior is legal and the plaintiff has overrun the period of prosecution. But, the plaintiff should bear some evidential burden too. For example, the plaintiff must prove the existence of frondose administrative behavior first. Otherwise, the plaintiff will bear disadvantageous results.

关 键 词：举证责任 中国 诉讼时效 《行政诉讼法》 举证权利 

分 类 号：D925.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]