检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:谷文惠[1] 杨冬茹[1] 董福生[1] 贾欣欣[2] 赵洁[2] 李淑娟[1]
机构地区:[1]河北医科大学口腔医学院,在050017 [2]河北保定市第二医院口腔科
出 处:《现代口腔医学杂志》2004年第3期256-258,共3页Journal of Modern Stomatology
摘 要:目的 研究不同功率超声龈下刮治对根面的影响。方法 选择因重度牙周炎需拔除的患牙 12颗 ,随机分成小功率超声刮治组、大功率超声刮治组、手工刮治组及病变对照组四个组 ,每组 3颗。记录刮治时间 ,扫描电镜观察各组标本的菌斑、牙石残留及损伤情况。结果 大功率超声刮治效率最高、最省时 ,小功率次之 ,手工刮治最慢 ;大功率超声刮治对根面损伤最大 ,小功率超声刮治损伤轻微 ,手工刮治损伤最小。结论 超声龈下刮治能有效地去除根面的菌斑、牙石 ,且省时、省力 ,但功率不宜过大。Objective To study the root surfaces following ultrasonic subgingival scaling.Methods Twelve teeth with severe periodontal disease were randomly divided into four groups,the time for scaling was recorded,the surface feature of all the specimens were observed under SEM.Results The efficiency of the ultrasonic subgingival scaling with high power set was higher,but the root damage was apparent,scaling with low power set was as effective as high,and the damage was trifling,hand instrumentation was fatigue and time-consuming,but it resulted in smoother and flatter root surfaces.Conclusion Ultrasonic subgingival scaling was effective in removing calculus and palque,and its advantages also included less fatigue,treatment time reduced,but it should be prudent to choose high power set.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145