检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:常浩
出 处:《临床医学进展》2025年第2期1927-1932,共6页Advances in Clinical Medicine
摘 要:手术一直是直肠癌治疗的基石,旨在切除肿瘤和尽可能保留肠道功能。腹腔镜手术已越发进入大众视野,机器人手术作为传统方法的微创替代方案。然而,传统腹腔镜手术在器械的移动性和灵巧性方面面临限制。另一方面,机器人方法通过为外科医生提供更好的精度、三维高清视图和卓越的组织操作能力来增强这些方面,使其成为直肠癌治疗越来越受欢迎的选择。我们进行此项Meta分析旨在评估机器人与腹腔镜方法治疗直肠癌的有效性和安全性及术后死亡率并发症等。Surgery has always been the cornerstone of rectal cancer treatment, aiming to remove the tumor and preserve bowel function as much as possible. Laparoscopic surgery has increasingly entered the public eye, and robotic surgery is a minimally invasive alternative to traditional methods. However, conventional laparoscopic surgery faces limitations in terms of mobility and dexterity of instruments. On the other hand, robotic approaches enhance these aspects by providing surgeons with better accuracy, 3D HD view, and superior tissue manipulation capabilities, making it an increasingly popular option for rectal cancer treatment. We conducted this meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of robotic versus laparoscopic approaches for rectal cancer, as well as postoperative mortality and complications.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249