论人为符号与非人为符号的区分——基于胡塞尔“第一研究”中的符号分类  

On the Distinction between Artificial Symbols and Non-Artificial Symbols—Based on the Symbol Classification in Husserl’s “First Study”

作　　者：杨汐 

机构地区：[1]同济大学人文学院,上海

出　　处：《哲学进展》2025年第2期15-20,共6页Advances in Philosophy

摘　　要：胡塞尔在《逻辑研究》的“第一研究”中将符号分为只有指示作用而没有意指作用的纯指号、既有指示作用又有意指作用的同时也是指号的表达以及只有意指作用而没有指示作用的纯表达。胡塞尔所谓的标号作为有意的或带有指示意图而造出的符号既可能是纯指号,也可能是同时也是指号的表达。标号是一类人为符号,但并非所有人为符号都是标号,因为人为符号并不需要在物理上由人制造出来,而且物理上由人制造出来的符号也不一定是人为符号。人为符号之本质在于其作为符号背后的有意性。非人为符号一定是就某个特定情境而言的符号,但人为符号却可以脱离特定情境而依然可被称为符号。Husserl classified symbols in his “First Study” of “The Study of Logic” into pure signs with only indicative function but no indicative function, expressions with both indicative and indicative functions but also signs, and pure expressions with only indicative function but no indicative function. Husserl’s concept of numbering as intentional or indicative symbols can be either purely indicative or simultaneously indicative. Symbols are a type of artificial symbol, but not all artificial symbols are symbols, because artificial symbols do not need to be physically created by humans, and symbols physically created by humans may not necessarily be artificial symbols. The essence of artificial symbols lies in the intentionality behind their use as symbols. Non-artificial symbols must be symbols in a specific context, but artificial symbols can still be referred to as symbols without specific context.

关 键 词：胡塞尔 《逻辑研究》 符号 表达 指号 人为符号 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]