检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]陕西理工大学人文学院,陕西 汉中
出 处:《创新教育研究》2023年第6期1594-1601,共8页Creative Education Studies
摘 要:2022年疫情期间大部分高校教学转为线上教学,有必要了解线上教学中学生学习的有效性以及学生对在线教学的偏好,这有助于疫情后有效开展线上教学。本文对6所师范院校的137位学生进行了在线调查。基于五点李克特量表,通过十个指标测量了学生在线学习的有效性,通过另五个指标测量了线上教学满意度。结果表明,作业提交与满足个人需求等四个指标效果较好,但在建构技能和知识、交互水平等六个指标上效果较差。衡量满意度的五个指标都为高度满意或中度满意。证明线上教学具有便捷性、资源充足的优势,但无法平衡实践与理论,且缺乏师生有效沟通。本研究结果可为疫情后如何实现线上、线下“双线”融合发展提供理论借鉴。During the epidemic period in 2022, most universities will switch to online teaching. It is neces-sary to understand the effectiveness of online teaching for middle school students’ learning and students’ preferences for online teaching, which will help to effectively develop online teaching after the epidemic. This paper presents an online survey of 137 students from 6 normal colleges. Based on the five-point Likert scale, the effectiveness of student online learning was measured through ten indicators, and the online teaching satisfaction was measured by another five indicators. The results show that the four indicators such as homework submission and meeting individual needs are good, but poor in the six indicators such as constructing skills and knowledge and interaction level. All five measures of satisfaction were high or moderate satisfaction. It proves that online teaching has the advantages of convenience and sufficient resources, but it cannot balance practice and theory, and lacks effective communication between teachers and students. The results of this study can provide theoretical reference for how to realize the integrated development of online and offline “double lines” after the epidemic.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.3