全称命题在互动中成立的方式——关于语言控制的思辨技巧  

The Way in Which Universal Propositions Hold True in Interactions—Critical Thinking Skills about Language Control

作　　者：滕飞[1] 

机构地区：[1]吉林建筑大学经济与管理学院,吉林 长春

出　　处：《现代语言学》2023年第4期1515-1519,共5页Modern Linguistics

摘　　要：社会意义上的全称命题并不存在,但这不代表全称命题在人的互动中不会被取信,信任全称命题的关键在于,避免反例对该种命题的证伪。常用的思辨技巧包括假二择一、质变以及检验回收,这些纯语言技术用于控制人的想象,以便达到受控者所产生的联想不必基于实例的效果。Universal proposition does not exist in the social sense, but this does not mean that universal proposition will not be trusted in human interaction. The key to trusting universal proposition is to avoid the falsification of such proposition by counterexamples. Common speculative techniques include false alternatives, qualitative transformation, and check retrieval. These pure language techniques are used to control the imagination of the person so that the associations generated by the person under control do not have to be based on the instance.

关 键 词：全称命题 假二择一 质变技术 检验回收 

分 类 号：G63[文化科学—教育学]