检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]大连理工大学外国语学院,辽宁 大连
出 处:《现代语言学》2024年第10期402-411,共10页Modern Linguistics
摘 要:自法律语言学诞生之日起,对于法律与语言的融合研究便日渐深入。其中,庭审话语作为一门机构性语言,因其规范性、严谨性及强烈的目的性为学者们所关注。国内学者对于这一领域的研究角度十分广泛,常常从不同的语言学视角进行融合性分析。笔者在中国知网上以“庭审话语”等为关键词对2002~2024年(9月)有关文献进行了检索,并对搜索成果进行整理分析,尝试从六个视角对我国当代庭审话语研究进行综述,以期更好地阐释相关领域研究的整体面貌,揭示国内学者兴趣热点,增强我们对于法律语言学尤其是庭审话语理解的系统性与深刻性。Since the birth of forensic linguistics, the researches on the integration of law and language have become increasingly in-depth. Among them, as an institutional language, courtroom discourse has attracted the attention of scholars because of its standardization, accuracy and rigor, and strong purpose. Chinese scholars have done a wide range of studies in this field from different linguistic perspectives. By searching relevant literature from 2002 to 2024 (September) on China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) with “courtroom discourse” as keywords, and sorting out and analyzing the results, this paper attempts to dig up the researches done on courtroom discourse from six linguistic perspectives, in order to better explain the overall picture of related fields of research, reveal the hot topics Chinese scholars are concerned with, and enhance our understanding of forensic linguistics, especially courtroom discourse in a systematic and profound way.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.135.190.163