检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:覃显芬
机构地区:[1]广西大学外国语学院,广西 南宁
出 处:《世界文学研究》2024年第2期98-104,共7页World Literature Studies
摘 要:乌托邦文学和反乌托邦文学都是人类追求理想社会的探索,乌托邦文学通常侧重理想社会的美好面,反乌托邦文学通常侧重“乌托邦式”理想社会实现后的黑暗面。《乌托邦》和《美丽新世界》作为乌托邦文学和反乌托邦文学的代表作之一,分析两部作品的叙事特点可以窥探乌托邦文学和反乌托邦文学的叙事特点。本文从想象的运用、时空构建、人物塑造的角度分析二者叙事上的异同,进一步讨论反乌托邦文学对乌托邦文学在叙事方法上的传承与发展。Both utopia literature and dystopian literature reflect the exploration of ideal society. Utopian literature usually describes a beautiful blueprint of a great society, while dystopian literature describes the bad side of utopian society if it comes true. Utopia and Brave New World are representative works of utopian literature and dystopia literature respectively. Making a comparative study of the narrative characteristics of the two works offers an insight into the narration features of utopia literature and dystopia literature. This paper attempts to discover the similarities and differences between their narration features from the perspectives of the use of imagination, the construction of time and space, and the characters. Then, it further discusses the inheritance and development of dystopian literature compared with utopian narration.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.17.164.48