“本土”实践与话语规划——对20世纪90年代外国文学研究论争的再探讨  

“Homegrown” Practices and Discursive Program:Revisiting the Debates on Foreign Literature Research in the 1990s

作　　者：杜心源[1] Du Xinyuan(the Department of Chinese Language and Literature,East China Normal University,Shanghai 200241,China)

机构地区：[1]华东师范大学中文系,上海市200241

出　　处：《文艺理论研究》2022年第3期90-99,共10页Theoretical Studies in Literature and Art

摘　　要：在20世纪90年代中国关于外国文学研究的论争中,形成了“本土/外国”这一二元性命题。中国学者意识到西方问题无法自明性地成为中国的问题,然而在强调外来话语规划的本土转换时,却往往将“本土”作为绝对性的支点,形成“文化身份”的话语形式,实际上复制了西方的同一性叙事。本文从论争中所包含的逻辑矛盾入手,对其进行批判性解读,解构“本土”的同一化倾向,并尝试提出去中心化的对抗性叙述。The debates on foreign literature research in the early 1990 s have formed an assumption of binary opposition between the“homegrown”and the“foreign”.Chinese scholars realized that Western issues cannot be taken as self-evident.However,when highlighting the transformation of Western theoretical paradigms from the local perspective,they tend to overprioritize the homegrown experience as the focal point to construct a form of discourse that in fact becomes a copy of the Western narrative of identity.This article takes the logical contradiction inherent in the debates as the point of departure,conducts a critical interpretation of them,and proposes a decentered antagonistic narrative after deconstructing the identification principle of“the homegrown”.

关 键 词：论争 本土 文化身份 话语规划 细读 

分 类 号：I106[文学—世界文学]