内地与澳门程序性违法法律后果之比较  

The Comparison to Legal Consequence of Procedural Illegal Activities Between Macao and Mainland of China

作　　者：王俊民[1] 闫召华[1] 

机构地区：[1]华东政法学院,上海200042

出　　处：《黑龙江省政法管理干部学院学报》2005年第6期88-92,共5页Journal of Heilongjiang Administrative Cadre College of Politics and Law

摘　　要：内地与澳门虽然都建立了程序性违法的制裁制度,但价值理念、法律传统等诸多方面的不同导致了两地在有关刑事诉讼程序性违法法律后果的规定上存在较大差异。针对警察、检察官或法官的各种违反法定诉讼程序的行为,澳门刑事诉讼法规定了诉讼行为无效制度和非法证据排除规则,构成其较为完善的程序性裁判机制。相比而言,内地有关程序性违法法律后果的规定则存在不少问题。深入比较两地的程序性违法法律后果,研究其各自的运作机理和制度绩效,对于两地尤其是我国内地程序性违法制裁制度的改革与完善具有重要的借鉴意义。Because of the difference on value conception and legal system,there are an obvious distinction on legal consequece of procedural illegal activities between Macao and Mainland of China,although they both set up the system of procedural sanction.To prevent the prosecutor and the judge from doing various procedural illegal activities,the criminal procedure law in Macao prescribed a perfect system composed by the principle of legality and the regulation of the refusal to illegal evidences.In comparison with Ma...

关 键 词：程序性违法 法律后果 无效宣告 程序性裁判 

分 类 号：D915.3[政治法律—诉讼法学]