Interferon and lamivudine combination therapy versus lamivudine monotherapy for hepatitis B e antigen-negative hepatitis B treatment:a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials  

作　　者：Shi, Yu Wu, Yi-Hua Shu, Zhe-Yue Zhang, Wan-Jun Yang, Jun Chen, Zhi 

机构地区：[1]Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Affiliated Hosp 1, State Key Lab Diag & Treatment Infect Dis, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China [2]Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Lab Combined Multiorgan Transplantat, Minist Publ Hlth,Affiliated Hosp 1, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China [3]Zhejiang Univ, Sch Med, Dept Gastroenterol, Affiliated Hosp 2, Hangzhou 310009, Zhejiang, Peoples R China

出　　处：《Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International》2010年第5期462-472,共11页国际肝胆胰疾病杂志（英文版）

基　　金：supported by grants from the Major State Basic Research Development Program (973) (No. 2007CB512905);the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 30771918);the Major State S&T Projects of China (11th Five-Year) (2008ZX10002-007)

摘　　要：BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos (t)ide analogue monotherapy. Therefore, combination therapy of drugs with synergistic antiviral effects was proposed to have a sustained response in these patients. We compared the effect and safety of lamivudine monotherapy and its combination with IFN including conventional interferon (CON-IFN) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for HBeAg-negative CHB patients. DATA SOURCES: A group of three independent reviewers identified 9 eligible randomized controlled trials through electronic searches (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry, and the Chinese Medical Database), manual searches, and contact with experts. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were defined as primary efficacy measures. We performed quantitative meta-analyses to assess differences between CON-IFN plus lamivudine combination and lamivudine monotherapy groups. RESULTS: No greater sustained virological and biochemical rates were found in patients receiving CON-IFN/lamivudine combination therapy [29.1% vs. 26.7%, odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.50, P=0.94, and 41.8% vs. 40.3%, OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.78-1.65, P=0.51, respectively],though a reduced YMDD mutation rate was achieved in the combination group [8.39% vs. 30.0%, OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.076-0.33, P<0.001]. However, data from one PEG-IFN trial showed greater sustained virological and biochemical rates in patients receiving combination therapy [response rate 19.5% vs. 6.6%, OR=3.42, 95% CI 1.71-6.84, P<0.001 and 60.0% vs. 44.2%, OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.23-2.85, P=0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CON-IFN to lamivudine did not improve treatment efficacy but suppressed YMDD mutation by lamivudine. Combination of PEG-IFN and lamivudine might increase the sustained response, and further clinical trials are needed for confirmation.BACKGROUND: It has been demonstrated that only a minority of patients with hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg) negative chronic hepatitis B (CHB) obtain a sustained response after either interferon (IFN) or nucleos (t)ide analogue monotherapy. Therefore, combination therapy of drugs with synergistic antiviral effects was proposed to have a sustained response in these patients. We compared the effect and safety of lamivudine monotherapy and its combination with IFN including conventional interferon (CON-IFN) and pegylated interferon (PEG-IFN) for HBeAg-negative CHB patients. DATA SOURCES: A group of three independent reviewers identified 9 eligible randomized controlled trials through electronic searches (MEDLINE, OVID, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library Clinical Trials Registry, and the Chinese Medical Database), manual searches, and contact with experts. Sustained virological and biochemical responses were defined as primary efficacy measures. We performed quantitative meta-analyses to assess differences between CON-IFN plus lamivudine combination and lamivudine monotherapy groups. RESULTS: No greater sustained virological and biochemical rates were found in patients receiving CON-IFN/lamivudine combination therapy [29.1% vs. 26.7%, odds ratio (OR)=0.98, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.65-1.50, P=0.94, and 41.8% vs. 40.3%, OR=1.13, 95% CI 0.78-1.65, P=0.51, respectively],though a reduced YMDD mutation rate was achieved in the combination group [8.39% vs. 30.0%, OR=0.16, 95% CI 0.076-0.33, P<0.001]. However, data from one PEG-IFN trial showed greater sustained virological and biochemical rates in patients receiving combination therapy [response rate 19.5% vs. 6.6%, OR=3.42, 95% CI 1.71-6.84, P<0.001 and 60.0% vs. 44.2%, OR=1.88, 95% CI 1.23-2.85, P=0.003, respectively]. CONCLUSIONS: Addition of CON-IFN to lamivudine did not improve treatment efficacy but suppressed YMDD mutation by lamivudine. Combination of PEG-IFN and lamivudine might increase the sustained response, and further clinical trials are needed for confirmation.

关 键 词：LAMIVUDINE INTERFERON-ALPHA combination therapy MONOTHERAPY HBeAg-negative chronic hepatitis B 

分 类 号：R512.62[医药卫生—内科学]