湛若水的儒佛之辨  

Zhan Ruoshui's Contend of Confucianism and Buddhism

作　　者：许潇[1] 

机构地区：[1]陕西师范大学宗教研究中心,西安710062

出　　处：《北京理工大学学报（社会科学版）》2014年第4期151-155,共5页Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology：Social Sciences Edition

基　　金：国家社会科学基金资助项目(11FZX014);陕西师范大学优秀博士学位论文资助项目(S2013YB01)

摘　　要：湛若水从"虚"、"静"概念的分析展开儒佛之辨,落实于对"随处体认天理"命题的论证,将"虚实同体"和"至静未尝无物,未尝有物"中对"虚"、"静"关系的辨析贯彻于对"随处体认天理"这个核心命题的论证中。湛若水极力论证陈献章之学并非近禅,围绕对儒佛关系的认识与王阳明反复论辩,在划清儒佛思想界限的表象下,蕴涵他对明代心学援佛入儒及其思想发展趋向的深层思考。儒佛之辨承载湛若水忧虑儒学正统性的卫道意识和道德学说。"随处体认天理"与"主静"说之关系,天理良知是"现成"还是"人心的一念萌动",对这些核心问题的论证,又体现他对儒佛之辨的自觉意识和深层哲学思考。The debate Zhan Ruoshui Confucianism and Buddhism from 'virtual', 'static' determination of the analysis of the concept of start, finally the awareness with the heavenly 'proposition. Will ‘false or true consubstantiality'and ‘to still have not nothing, did not have the physical view is consistent in its' awareness in the heavenly 'proposition of academic thought from the deep and FoLao learning drawn. No matter Zhan Ruoshui explain to the world of Chen xianzhang played to learn the Buddha's deep meditation or or Zhan Ruoshui and WangShouRen of Confucianism and Buddhism, argument or debate is just a symptom, it came out of the reaction is the core issue of Zhan Ruoshui philosophy and the philosophy WangShouRen, Chen xianzhang played in the core level differences and differences: 'awareness in the heavenly'and 'the Lord static', the relationship between the heavenly conscience is 'ready'or 'a heart to be read'. The differentiation of Confucianism and Buddhism as a kind of carrier, bearing the weight of the Zhan Ruoshui defend traditional moral principles consciousness, carrying Zhan Ruoshui in Ming dynasty for philosophers to thinking about the problems of carrying Zhan Ruoshui legitimate concerns for Confucianism.

关 键 词：湛若水 虚 静 儒佛之辨 

分 类 号：B248.99[哲学宗教—中国哲学]