对现行真理定义的几点异议  

Several Different Opinions about the Definition of the Truth

作　　者：赵建梅[1] 黄世虎[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京师范大学经济法政学院,江苏南京210097

出　　处：《安徽农业大学学报（社会科学版）》2001年第1期40-41,共2页Journal of Anhui Agricultural University:SOC.SCI.

摘　　要：现行的哲学教材和认识论专著所普遍界定的真理定义是“真理是对客观事物及其规律的正确反映”。笔者通过对此定义的分析指出，现行真理定义虽然是可行的，但不够严密和科学，仍有一些缺憾和漏洞。更为准确的真理定义应为“真理属于认识范畴，是主体在实践过程中客体的本质及其规律的正确反映。”The common definition of the truth nowadays from the philosophy books and the works of epistemology is that“ The truth is correct reflection to objective things and their laws” . From the analyses of this definition, the author thinks that this definition is feasible but not tight and scientific enough, and there are still some drawbacks and leaks. In the author's opinion, the more correct definition of the truth is that“ The truth belongs to the category of epistemology, and it is correct reflection of subject to the essence and law of object in the process of practice.”

关 键 词：真理 定义 主体 客体 感性认识 客观事物 认识论 

分 类 号：B023.3[哲学宗教—哲学理论]