Inhibition of tumor growth in xenografted nude mice with adenovirus-mediated endostatin gene comparison with recombinant endostatin protein  

作　　者：梁志慧 吴沛宏 李立 薛刚 曾益新 黄文林 

机构地区：[1]Cancer Center, Sun Yat sen University, Guangzhou 510060, China [2]Department of General Surgery, Chengdu Military General Hospital, Chengdu 610083, China

出　　处：《Chinese Medical Journal》2004年第12期1809-1814,共6页中华医学杂志（英文版）

基　　金：Hi-TechResearchandDevelopmentProgramofChina(863Program)(No2003AA216061);andCMBSUMSScholarProgram(No.98677)

摘　　要：Background Inhibition of tumor growth by endostatin has been shown to be an effective strategy in cancer therapy in mice However, its widespread application has been hampered by difficulties in a large scale production of the recombinant endostatin protein, rapid loss bioactivity of the protein, and the cumbersome daily administration These limitations could be resolved by in vivo delivery and expression of the endostatin gene In this study, we observed the effect and advantage of endostatin gene therapy mediated by a recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad/hEndo) on the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma BEL 7402 xenografted tumors, comparison with recombinant endostatin protein Methods Hepatocellular carcinoma BEL 7402 cells were inoculated subcutaneously in the flank of Balb/c nude mice Nine days after tumor cell inoculation, animals were given a cycle of four courses of intra tumoral injections of Ad/hEndo of 5×10 8 pfu (low dose group) and 1×10 9 pfu (high dose group) at intervals of six days, respectively Recombinant human endostatin protein (rhEndo) was administrated daily subcutaneously at a dose of 10 mg·kg 1 ·d 1 at a site nearby the tumor for ten days The expression of endostatin mRNA in tumor tissue was analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) after Ad/hEndo injection Dynamic changes of concentration of endostatin protein in tumor tissue were quantitated by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Results After 4 courses of treatment, the tumor growth rates of high dose treated group with 1×10 9 pfu of Ad/hEndo were inhibited by 42 26% compared with the Ad/ LacZ control group ( P =0 001) and by 46 26% compared with the NIH buffer control group ( P =0 003), respectively However, in this study, Ad/hEndo at low dose of 5×10 8 pfu failed to demonstrate significant inhibition of tumor growth, compared with control groups After daily administration of recombinant human endostatin protein (rhEndo) for 9 days, the ratio of T/C (rhEndo group versus PBS group) was less than 47% HoweBackground Inhibition of tumor growth by endostatin has been shown to be an effective strategy in cancer therapy in mice However, its widespread application has been hampered by difficulties in a large scale production of the recombinant endostatin protein, rapid loss bioactivity of the protein, and the cumbersome daily administration These limitations could be resolved by in vivo delivery and expression of the endostatin gene In this study, we observed the effect and advantage of endostatin gene therapy mediated by a recombinant adenoviral vector (Ad/hEndo) on the growth of hepatocellular carcinoma BEL 7402 xenografted tumors, comparison with recombinant endostatin protein Methods Hepatocellular carcinoma BEL 7402 cells were inoculated subcutaneously in the flank of Balb/c nude mice Nine days after tumor cell inoculation, animals were given a cycle of four courses of intra tumoral injections of Ad/hEndo of 5×10 8 pfu (low dose group) and 1×10 9 pfu (high dose group) at intervals of six days, respectively Recombinant human endostatin protein (rhEndo) was administrated daily subcutaneously at a dose of 10 mg·kg 1 ·d 1 at a site nearby the tumor for ten days The expression of endostatin mRNA in tumor tissue was analyzed by reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RT PCR) after Ad/hEndo injection Dynamic changes of concentration of endostatin protein in tumor tissue were quantitated by enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) Results After 4 courses of treatment, the tumor growth rates of high dose treated group with 1×10 9 pfu of Ad/hEndo were inhibited by 42 26% compared with the Ad/ LacZ control group ( P =0 001) and by 46 26% compared with the NIH buffer control group ( P =0 003), respectively However, in this study, Ad/hEndo at low dose of 5×10 8 pfu failed to demonstrate significant inhibition of tumor growth, compared with control groups After daily administration of recombinant human endostatin protein (rhEndo) for 9 days, the ratio of T/C (rhEndo group versus PBS group) was less than 47% Howe

关 键 词：ANTIANGIOGENESIS ENDOSTATIN ADENOVIRUS gene therapy 

分 类 号：R73-3[医药卫生—肿瘤]