介音问题的梵汉对音研究  

Research on Chinese Medials in Sanskrit-Chinese Translation

作　　者：刘广和[1] 

机构地区：[1]中国人民大学对外语言文化学院,北京100871

出　　处：《古汉语研究》2002年第2期2-7,共6页Research in Ancient Chinese Language

摘　　要：用后汉三国、两晋、唐、宋汉译佛经的梵汉对音资料考察汉语的介音,发现i介音至少在东汉就有了,纯四等韵字有从东汉起就对i介音的,证明主张《切韵》纯四等韵无介音的学说不符合译经语言事实。By careful probing Chinese medial with the material of Chinese Sanskrit Scriptures in the Western Han and San Guo(后汉三国),Liang Jin(两晋 ), Tang and Song Dynasties(唐宋), we hold that the -i- medial at least existed in the Eastern Han Dynasty (东汉 ) and some of the characters of the fourth division(四等) were used to translate the -i- medial, which demonstrates the advocation that there is no medial in the pure fourth division(纯四等) in Qieyun(切韵) does not conform to the linguistic facts.

关 键 词：介音 语言事实 《切韵》 汉语 韵字 符合 汉译佛经 东汉 后汉 三国 

分 类 号：H113[语言文字—汉语] H114.9