检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:杨增菊[1]
机构地区:[1]安徽大学,安徽合肥230026
出 处:《合肥联合大学学报》2001年第3期13-17,共5页
摘 要:大家知道 ,席勒在《审美教育书简》(以下简称《书简》)对资本主义生产方式作了较为详细的分析。这与马克思《经济学———哲学手稿》(以下简称《手稿》)中对资本主义社会“异化劳动”的分析有某些相似的地方。但席勒将其造成的分裂归之于人心腐化 ,因而到主观世界中去寻找解决问题的方案 ,从而陷入不可理喻的困惑之中。而马克思受其启发 ,把目光指向现实的客观基础 ,从而找到治疗社会的方剂。As we all know,Schiller had given us a rather detailed analysis about capitalism manufacture fashion in his 'Script of Aesthetic Education'(abbreviated as 'Script').This has some similarity with Marx's analysis about capitalism society 's labour alienation in his 'Economics-Philosophy Manuscript in 1844'(abbreviated as 'Manuscript').But Schiller attributed the division that had caused to the degeneration of soul,thus he went to the subjective world to find out the solution to the problem and sank into an unreasonable perplex.However,Marx got nuges from him,and put his eyesight to objective basis of reality,thus he found out the remedy for curing this society.This paper trys to compare the relative aesthetic ideas in these two books.
关 键 词:席勒 《审美教育书简》 马克思 《经济学——哲学手稿》 美学思想
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222