检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《系统工程》2005年第8期56-61,共6页Systems Engineering
摘 要:采用上交所国债数据对利率期限结构的4种构造模型进行较系统的横向对比实证。结果表明多项式样条法、B-样条法在价格拟合度方面占有明显优势;而Nelson-Siegel模型和Svennson模型构造的利率期限结构规范性较好,但其价格拟合度牺牲较多,其结果与债券市场隐含的期限结构有一定差异;B-样条法在利率期限结构的拟合精度、曲线光滑性及平稳性方面的综合效果最好。应用B-样条法对整个样本期国债交易数据的跟踪计算结果表明,该模型算法稳定可靠,能够精确有效地追踪国债利率期限结构的系统性变动,最适合作为当前债券利率期限结构的构造模型。This paper tests and compares four methods of estimating the term structure from on-the-run Government Bonds in SSE. The results show that Polynomial spline and B-spline fit the bond prices better than Nelson-Siegel and Svensson models, but the latter models are inclined to give much more standard term structure with lower precision of fitting prices. The result also reveals that B-spline model performs better than other models synthetically in precision of fitting prices, curve smoothness and stability. Track calculation over total sample period indicates that algorithm of B-splines model is steady and reliable, and it can reveal the systematic change of Government bond interest rate term structure accurately and effectively.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.68