不同类型学校高中生应付方式的比较研究  

Coping style comparison research on the different kinds of high school students

作　　者：蔡青[1] 朱忠良[1] 樊小力[1] 

机构地区：[1]西安交通大学医学院生理与病理生理学系,西安710061

出　　处：《中国行为医学科学》2006年第2期162-164,共3页Chinese Journal of Behavioral Medical Science

基　　金：陕西科技攻关项目(2001K10-G7)

摘　　要：目的探讨重点高中、普通高中、职业高中三类学校高中生应付方式差异。方法采用应付方式问卷对唐山市重点、普通、职业三类学校高中生进行调查分析。结果三类学校高中生第一心理应付方式均为解决问题,三类学校高中生的解决问题分值分别为(7.81±2.64)分、(7.88±2.52)分、(8.12±2.21)分(P>0.05)。在其余应付因子均分上,重点学校高中生均显著低于普通、职业学校高中生。普通学校高中生有较高的幻想得分[(5.76±2.04)分],职业学校高中生有较高的求助得分[(5.87±2.20)分],其他因子差异无显著性。结论重点学校高中生多采取积极的应付方式,普通高中学生、职业高中学生较多地采取退避、自责、幻想等消极方式。Objective To evaluate coping style of the key high school students, general high school students and professional high school students. Methods 1860 students from three kinds of high school in the city of TangShan were investigated with Coping Style Questionnaire. Result The first mental copying style among the total students from the three kinds of high schools was solving-problem. The scores of solving-problem of three kinds of high school students were 7.81±2.64,7.88±2.52,8. 12±2.21, respectively. The differences of the other copying styles among three kinds of high school students were obvious. The scores of the key high school students were obviously lower than those of the other two kinds of high school students. Through comparing general high school students with professional high school stndents, it showed there was obviously higher tantasy score in the general high school students（5.76±2.04） and there was obviously higher resort score in professional high school students（5.87±2.20）. Conclusion The key high school students were more prone to positive coping style, and the other two kinds of high school stndents were more prone to negative coping style.

关 键 词：应付方式 应激 心理健康 高中生 

分 类 号：G635.5[文化科学—教育学] B844.2[哲学宗教—发展与教育心理学]