“新学”与“王学”探析——兼与徐规、杨天保两先生商榷  

On New School and Wang School

作　　者：熊凯[1] 

机构地区：[1]南京大学哲学系,江苏南京210093

出　　处：《南昌大学学报（人文社会科学版）》2006年第3期9-13,29,共6页Journal of Nanchang University(Humanities and Social Sciences)

摘　　要：从发生学的角度,《走出“荆公新学”》较早地对学界“新学”、“王学”互指现象提出质疑,但也存在偏重官学形式而将两者割裂的问题。实际上,从王学官学化、“新学”概念的由来、内涵及宋人态度等看来,王学与新学在历史上分别与两种“新学”概念相联系:一是见于史料、立于学宫、主要包括《三经新义》、《字说》的与“王学”存在差异的“新学”;一是由新经义、新字学、新学风、新学学派等四个构成,有官学、新经学、学派三种含义与“王学”完全等同的“新学”。虽然这两种“新学”概念在历史演变过程中最终被合一,但在具体的思想研究当中还是应该加以注意的。From its origin, Going out of Jinggong Xinxue has questioned the bio - osmosis between the New School and the Wang School, but has the problem of dissevering the New School from the Wang School because of its emphasis on authority form too much. Actually, the Wang School is connected with two New Schools in view of authority form and criticism of the people in the Song Dynasty： one is authority form made up of Three Books of New Meaning and Zi Shuo, and different from the Wang School;the other is the same as the Wang School made up of new meaning, new word school, new style of study, new school, and they have three meanings：authority learning, Jing Xue, and school. Though being amalgamated,the two New School concepts should be noticed by investigators.

关 键 词：王安石 新学 王学 

分 类 号：B244.5[哲学宗教—中国哲学]