检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《云南师范大学学报(对外汉语教学与研究版)》2006年第4期65-69,共5页Journal of Yunnan Normal University(Teaching & Studying Chinese as a Foreign Language Edition)
摘 要:从跨文化语用学角度来看,EFL课堂问答过程中往往发生一系列的“面子威胁行为”。运用民族交际学话语事件描述框架,对比NS教师和NNS教师在EFL课堂中的提问部分,其研究结果显示NNS教师的语言强加度高于NS教师。根据“面子威胁公式”,NS教师与学生之间的社会距离大于NSS教师。进一步分析揭示,交际双方不同的意识形态、文化适应方式和团体内外意识影响师生问的社会距离。为减弱“面子威胁行为”,不同教师在提问中常采用不同的交际策略。From the perspective of cross-cultural pragmatics, the question-answer process in TEF classroom often incurs a series of "face-threatening acts". This thesis gives a comparison of the question-answer process between NS teachers'and NNS teachers' EFL classes from the perspective of the ethnographical discourse analysis. It applies the ' face-threatening act' model to explain their differences. The findings reveal that NNS teachers are linguistically more powerful than NS teachers, and the social distance between NS teachers and the students is greater than that between NSS teachers and the students. A further analysis reveals that different ideologies, ways of cultural adaptation and group consciousness exert some influence on their social distance. To weaken ' face- threatening acts', different teachers use different communicative strategies in this process.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222