检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:陈能[1] 罗玉坤[1] 谢黎虹[1] 朱智伟[1] 段彬伍[1] 章林平[1]
机构地区:[1]农业部稻米及制品质量监督检验测试中心/中国水稻研究所,浙江杭州310006
出 处:《作物学报》2006年第8期1193-1196,共4页Acta Agronomica Sinica
摘 要:研究了5323份稻谷样品(籼稻谷3805份、粳稻谷1518份)的蛋白质含量的分布特点、类别比例及与稻米品质的关系。结果表明,我国当前生产上应用的水稻品种的蛋白质含量呈单峰曲线分布,虽覆盖6.0%-15.7%的宽广范围,但主要分布于8.0%-11.0%;籼稻与粳稻蛋白质含量的分布曲线有所差别。约73%的水稻品种具中等蛋白质含量,高、低蛋白的品种分别占14%和13%;其中高蛋白籼稻品种的比例是粳稻的6倍,而低蛋白籼稻品种仅为粳稻的1/3。蛋白质含量对稻米的垩白度、透明度及直链淀粉含量等品质指标有负面影响,因而高蛋白品种的优质率显著低于中等及低蛋白的品种。本文还对稻谷、谷壳、糙米和精米等不同形态样品的蛋白质含量作了比较,并进行了相关和回归分析。Rice protein is rich lysine, which is the first hmiting essential amino acid. In an earlier study, the genetic properties of rice protein, the environmental conditions that affected the protein content, and the correlation between protein content and grain quality have been reported. The protein content of rice can be the result of interaction between environmental forces and genetic properties of the individual. From 1970-1990, several institutions, such as Chinese Academy of Agriculture Science began a screening and identifying program to research the quality and protein content from the China' s germplasm collections. To our knowledge, there are few studies concerning the distribution, classification of all the rice varieties. In this paper, the distribution, classification and related quality of protein content of 5 323 varieties (times) rice in China were studied. Of these, 3 805 are indica varieties (times) and 1 518 are japonica varieties (times). Results showed that there was a normal distribution for protein content of rice varieties in general. The protein content was 8%-11% for most rice varieties, although a broad range from 6.0%-15.7% was found in this study. There were some differences for indica and japonica rice on distribution curve of protein content. The protein content ranged from 6.3 % to 15.7% ,in ind/cas, and 6.0% to 13.6% in japon/cas(Fig.1). Classifying the rice protein content into high (11%), middle (8%-11%) and low (8%) groups, 73% office varieties belonged to middle group, 14% to high, and 13% to low. Among them, the percentage of varieties with high protein content for indica rice was 5 times more than that for japonica rice, but that with low protein content, for indica rice, was one third of that for japonica (Fig. 2). Either indica or japonica rice, the rate of superior varieties with low or middle protein contents was significantly higher than that with high protein content. Due to the negative effect of protein content on chalkiness, translucen
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.249