检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:吴鑫德[1] 张庆林[1] 熊士荣[2] 李跃春[2] 李秋香[2]
机构地区:[1]西南大学心理学院,重庆400715 [2]湖南师范大学化学化工学院,长沙410081
出 处:《心理科学》2006年第4期802-805,781,共5页Journal of Psychological Science
基 金:国家重点学科西南大学基础心理学项目(批准号:西国重04002);全国教育科学"十五"规划重点课题(批准号:DBB010510)资助
摘 要:将高中生化学问题解决思维过程口语报告分为相应的10个行为指标进行人工编码和定量分析。被试是56名高中生,材料为6个中等难度的化学问题,通过“出声思考”实验,记录口语报告,并对口语报告进行编码和数据统计分析,结果发现:(1)高中优生的重复、解释、推理、归纳、总结等行为指标上明显优于中等生;(2)在解决不同类型的化学问题时,重复、设问、推理、归纳和反思等指标存在明显差异;(3)学生能力层次与问题类别在重复、推理、归纳和试误等行为指标上存在明显交互作用。Manually coded and quantificationally analyzed were 10 behavior codes consistent with the verbal record of senior middle school students in the process of chemistry problem-solving. The subjects were 56 students. The materials were 6 middle-difficulty chemistry problems. Through phonation-thinking, verbal record-coding and datum-analyzing, we obtained the results as follows: (1) the good-learning students did better than the poor-learning ones in repetition, explanation, inference, conclusion and summarization; (2) In their solving different chemistry problems, there were obvious differences in repetition, inference, conclusion, reflection; (3) There was obvious interaction between ability levels and problem sorts in repetition, inference, concludsion and attempt to get solution.
分 类 号:B842.3[哲学宗教—基础心理学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:3.142.43.53