检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:董世峰[1]
出 处:《现代哲学》2003年第3期51-57,共7页Modern Philosophy
摘 要:传统伦理学的价值伦理学转向,一是基于研究重心由“应当”问题转换为“德行之所以然”的问题,二是基于研究范式上由目的论、德性论、义务论等转换为价值论。作为传统伦理学的集大成者,康德伦理学一方面因其浓烈的价值论色彩而成为舍勒和N.哈特曼价值伦理学的前奏,另一方面因其“实质”内容缺失而致的形式主义又为后者的拓展提供了空间。舍勒,尤其是N.哈特曼的实质价值伦理学正是在康德伦理学的理论平台上得以建立的。The research of traditional ethics has shifted it focus to value ethics. This is shown in mainly two respects: firstly, the issue of "ought to" has given way to the issue of "the cause of morality" ; Secondly the research of paradigms of teleology, moralism and deontology has given way to axiology. As a great collection of traditional ethics and with a strong touch of axiology, Kant's ethics becomes a prelude to Max scheler and N. Hartmann's ethics. On the other hand, because of its lack in content of "matter", it provides room of development for his latecomers. N. Hartmann founds his ethics of value of " matter" exactly on the basis of Kant' s ethics.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.198