检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:任平山[1]
机构地区:[1]西南交通大学艺术与传播学院
出 处:《西域研究》2008年第2期104-115,共12页The Western Regions Studies
摘 要:学界一般认为古代龟兹是小乘说一切有部文化中心,克孜尔中心柱窟图像构成是小乘僧人一佛一菩萨(弥勒)崇拜的反映。本文探讨了说一切有部对弥勒菩萨的态度。从与说一切有部相关的典籍中检索出有关弥勒的文献并进行分析,最后发现这个部派其实反对弥勒崇拜,这使我们重新审视传统理论的两个方面——克孜尔石窟的教派属性,以及弥勒菩萨的图像志。In academic circles,ancient Qiuci is usually regarded as an important cultural center of the Sarvastivadins and the patterning of the wall paintings in the central-pillar caves at Kizil is considered as the reflection of adoration of monk,Buddha and Bodhisattva(Maitreya)by Theravada.This paper studies the Sarvastivadins's opinion of the worship of Maitreya.After searching and analyzing those paragraphs concerning Maitreya in the Sarvastivadins's sutra,the author finds that this Buddhist sect actually stands against the worship of Maitreya.The finding made us to reconsider two different aspects of traditional viewpoint:the sect attribute of Kizil grottoes and the iconographic history of Bodhisattva Maitreya in Kizil.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.80