检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]天津商业大学教务处,天津300134 [2]天津商业大学理学院,天津300134
出 处:《天津商业大学学报》2008年第3期50-53,共4页Journal of Tianjin University of Commerce
摘 要:对学生学业成绩的评价,传统习惯方法是以算术平均数为标准进行评价,还有人用平均学分绩点和学分权平均原始成绩为标准。本文提出基于学分制的学生学业成绩评价模型——学分权平均标准成绩和因子分析法,并通过实例分析比较了这两种方法比学分权平均原始成绩方法的科学性、合理性。According to traditional method, students' academic achievement is evaluated by arithmetic average, or by average credit and average of primitive score by credit weight. Adopting two new methods of average of criterion score by credit weight and factor analysis, the paper advances an evaluation model of students' academic achievement based on the credit system. The two new methods are further analyzed and compared with the traditional method of average of primitive score by credit weight. The results indicate that the new methods are more scientific and rational than the traditional one.
分 类 号:G647[文化科学—高等教育学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.183