中国古代有逻辑思想,但没有逻辑学——答马佩教授  被引量:6

There was Not any Logical System but Logical Thought in Ancient China——A Reply to Ma Pei

在线阅读下载全文

作  者:程仲棠[1] 

机构地区:[1]暨南大学新闻与传播学院,广东广州510632

出  处:《暨南学报(哲学社会科学版)》2008年第6期1-9,共9页Jinan Journal(Philosophy and Social Sciences)

摘  要:广义的思维形式即思维形态不是逻辑学的研究对象,狭义的思维形式才是逻辑学的研究对象,就传统逻辑而言,狭义的思维形式是用概念变项或命题变项代替思维形态中的具体概念或具体命题的结果。由思维形态构成的理论是逻辑思想,逻辑思想是从逻辑思维发展为逻辑学的中介环节。名辩理论的出现证明中国古代有逻辑思想,不足以证明中国古代有逻辑学。The object of logic study is the specialized form of thinking instead of the generalized form of thinking,that is,formation of thinking.As far as the traditional logic is concerned,the specialized form of thinking results from substituting the conception variables or propositional variables for the concrete conceptions or propositions in the formation of thinking.Logical thought is a speculation on the formation of thinking,which is merely an intermediary from the logical thinking to the logical system.What the so-called Ming-bian 'logic' witnesses is not that there was any logical system in ancient China,but that there was some logical thought in ancient China.

关 键 词:逻辑学 逻辑思想 逻辑思维 思维形式 思维形态 

分 类 号:B81[哲学宗教—逻辑学]

 

参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级参考文献:

正在载入数据...

 

耦合文献:

正在载入数据...

 

引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

二级引证文献:

正在载入数据...

 

同被引文献:

正在载入数据...

 

相关期刊文献:

正在载入数据...

相关的主题
相关的作者对象
相关的机构对象