检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
作 者:舒冏[1] 曾咏梅[1] 穆攀伟[1] 王曼曼[1] 张国超[1] 曾龙驿[1]
机构地区:[1]中山大学附属第三医院内分泌科,广州510630
出 处:《中国现代药物应用》2009年第7期210-212,共3页Chinese Journal of Modern Drug Application
摘 要:目的探讨传统的病例为引导(CBS)联合使用问题-讨论-指导(PDG)教学方法在内分泌科见习教学中的可行性及有效性。方法观察在本院内分泌科进行临床见习的本院2004级临床医学系学生共113人,按随机数字表随机分为两组,一组为对照组,采用传统CBS教学法;另一组为实验组,实施CBS+PDG教学法。两组学生在2周见习结束时进行操作、理论出科考试进行对比,同时采用自行设计的调查问卷进行主观效果评价。结果从理论及操作出科考试成绩来看,CBS+PDG教学法明显优于传统的CBS教学法(P<0.01);实验组各项主观评分均超过对照组,提示学生们对CBS+PDG教学法的主观评价明显优于传统的CBS教学法(P<0.01)。结论CBS+PDG教学方法对提高见习学生临床能力具有可行性及有效性。Objective To explore the feasibility and effectiveness of teaching methods of ease based study (CBS) joint problem-discuss-guidance (PDG). Methods A total of 113 Sun Yat-sen University 2004 probationary students of clinical medicine were .randomly assigned to two groups : the control group using CBS traditional teaching methods, and the experimental group using CBS + PDG teaching methods, their theory and operation test score were observed at the end of two weeks probation, At the same time, using self-designed questionnaire for subjective evaluation. Results CBS + PDG teaching methods was obviously better than CBS traditional teaching methods on their theory and operation test score( P 〈 0. 01 ) ; The subjective evaluation of CBS + PDG teaching methods was superior to that of CBS traditional teaching methods ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion CBS + PDG teaching methods can feasible and effectively enhance the clinical competence of probationary students.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.15