检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
出 处:《东北大学学报(社会科学版)》2009年第6期471-476,共6页Journal of Northeastern University(Social Science)
基 金:辽宁省2008年度社会科学基金资助项目(L08BZX003)
摘 要:流行于国内外学界的"劳动资料说"是对马克思技术本质观的知识论误读,造成了对马克思技术本质观真实意蕴的遮蔽。事实上,马克思立足文化哲学的视阈,回答了技术本质的问题。在他看来,技术不是单纯的"物质手段"、"工具"或"劳动资料体系",而是人类的感性活动形式、历史的存在方式或文化形式。马克思的技术本质观既突出了技术的人文内涵,从而克服了知识论哲学技术本质观工具主义、客观主义的理论局限,又揭示出技术所蕴涵的现实社会关系,从而达到了对西方文化哲学技术本质观的理论超越。The theory of "implements of labor" which prevails academically home and abroad is actually an misunderstanding of the knowledge philosophy in view of the essence of Marx' s idea about technology, thus covering the real connotation of Marx' s view. In fact, Marx had answered the question of technological essence, based on his cultural/philosophical perspective that the technology is not simply the "physical means", "instruments" or "implements of labor" but the form of human beings' perceptual action, existence of history or culture. Marx's view on technological essence not only highlights the humanistic connotation of technology so as to get rid of the theoretic limitation of instrumentalism and objectivism in the philosophy of knowledge but also reveals the realistic social relationship arising from technological connotation, thus transcending the views on technological essence as expounded in western philosophy.
分 类 号:N031[自然科学总论—科学技术哲学]
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.222