检索规则说明:AND代表“并且”;OR代表“或者”;NOT代表“不包含”;(注意必须大写,运算符两边需空一格)
检 索 范 例 :范例一: (K=图书馆学 OR K=情报学) AND A=范并思 范例二:J=计算机应用与软件 AND (U=C++ OR U=Basic) NOT M=Visual
机构地区:[1]湖南第一师范学院,湖南长沙410205 [2]湖南师范大学,湖南长沙410081
出 处:《怀化学院学报》2010年第1期81-83,共3页Journal of Huaihua University
摘 要:阮籍哲学文本的逻辑建构和文学文本的意象创造,存在着一以贯之的思维方式,那就是继承《周易》"立象以尽意"而来的象思维,不同于王弼"得意在忘象"的以意为主的本体思维方式,凸现出的是感性、具体的"象"的独立价值,又以适合之媒介身份完成以象尽意的特殊功能。通过《通易论》和《乐论》两则哲学文本的细读,挖掘象思维的形成和发展,并以此思考文学文本中意象创造的思维惯性。In Ruan Ji's philosophical texts and literary texts of the logical construction of the image creation, there is a consistent way of thinking, which is from the Book of Changes that image should bear meaning. The image thinking highlights the independent value of the emotional, specific "image", and the special features of "image giving fullness of concept" through the appropriate channel. It is different from Wang Bi's ontology thinking of "forgetting images after getting ideas". Through reading the philosophical texts ( "Tong Yi Lun" and "Yue Lun"), the author explores the formation and development of the image thinking and ponders the inertia phenomenon of using the image thinking in his literary texts.
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在载入数据...
正在链接到云南高校图书馆文献保障联盟下载...
云南高校图书馆联盟文献共享服务平台 版权所有©
您的IP:216.73.216.145